Welcome to Digital Rage. I am Jeff the producer here at Byer Company. This is part four of our
Cybersecurity Marketing Series. Today we talk about how to actually stand out in a crowded
cybersecurity market. This is where you resist the temptation to use a guy in a hoodie
in front of a computer. That is not what they look like. Let's get into it.
Welcome to the Deep Dive. Today we are tackling a problem that while anyone trying to get
noticed in a crowded space really understands. But we are looking at it through the specific
lens of cybersecurity. How on earth do you stand out when it feels like everyone is saying
the same thing? It is a huge challenge in that market. We have got some source material
here, an article called How to actually stand out in a crowded cybersecurity market. And
it really puts its finger on the pulse of the problem. It argues the market is just drowning
in vendors all using the same language. AI, zero trust, next gen, everything, threat
prevention. Oh, the buzzwords. All the buzzwords exactly. And they are relying on these incredibly
generic visuals too. Oh yeah, you know the ones. Dark backgrounds, glowing padlocks,
maybe a hacker in a hoodie. Matrix code falling down the screen. Yeah. It is like a visual
cliche factory. The article points out this, this sameness makes them all blur together
into what it calls forgettable blobs. Precisely. And when you sound and look like everyone
else, the most likely outcome is that potential customers just scroll past. They tune out.
Your message is just noise. It's part of the background noise. Yeah. Okay, so let's get
into it then. Our mission for this deep dive is to unpack this article and really pull
out the core strategies it suggests for vendors to actually rise above all that noise to differentiate
themselves. And the source of frames, these not just as like abstract ideas, but as practical
strategies. They're apparently based on a larger guide designed specifically to tackle
these, you know, common marketing pain points in cyber. Right. Practical steps. The fundamental
insight this piece starts with is pretty crucial. Maybe even a little counterintuitive.
Okay. Is that if you try to be relevant to absolutely everyone. Mm-hmm. And if you
sound like everyone else while doing it, you basically guarantee you'll be ignored by
most people. Huh. So differentiation isn't about the broadest appeal. No, it's about
having a distinct recognizable identity. So given that problem blending in, where does
the article suggest a company should even, you know, begin to break free? It sounds like
the first step is about making a choice, narrowing down. That's exactly right. Strategy
one is pick a clear niche. Okay. The article makes a really strong case that trying to be
this comprehensive solution for every possible security problem for every type of customer.
Well, that's the fastest path to being utterly forgettable. Right. Becoming a generalist.
Nobody remembers. And it gives some pretty practical examples of how you might define that
niche. Doesn't it? It's not just focus, but focus on what? Yeah. It suggests several
angles. Like you could focus entirely on a specific industry. Think security solutions
built just for fintech startups, right? They have unique compliance needs. Okay. Yeah.
Fintech or maybe focus on a highly specific but critical use case. Like API security
tailored just for healthcare platforms dealing with sensitive data. Oh, interesting. Very
specific. Very. Or in other ways targeting a particular company size and maturity level,
offering say compliance for security tools designed for those mid market saws companies.
You know, the one scaling fast, but maybe lacking huge security teams. I see. So instead
of just a generic, we secure your data. It's more like we deeply understand the specific
API vulnerabilities in healthcare data. Or we get the compliance hurdles of fintech startup
faces. Exactly. And the article claims this focus leads to much sharper messaging. How
does that work? Well, by understanding the specific pain points and importantly, the
language of that narrow audience, your marketing speaks directly to them. Right. You're not
just shouting into the void. You're having a, well, a targeted conversation. And what's
really powerful about this, the source says, it doesn't just make campaigns more effective.
It builds a stronger reputation. You become known as the go to expert for that specific
problem for that specific problem and that specific group. Yeah. Okay. So step one, nish
down, decide who you're talking to and what specific problem you solve. Then the article
moves on from the message itself to how you present it. This is where the look and feel
comes in. Exactly. Strategy two is about owning a creative tone and visual identity. Right.
The source highlights that visual monotony we touched on, the dark themes, the padlocks,
the matrix code. And the tone is often just relentlessly fear based, you know, the threats
are coming by our firewall or your doom. Yeah, it's all doom and gloom very intimidating.
So the article pushes back hard against that. What's the alternative? It suggests pretty
much do the opposite. Instead of dark and scary, it suggests injecting some personality,
maybe use bold color palettes, clean, approachable layouts or even using illustration instead
of those generic sock photos or complicated network diagrams. Illustration, that's interesting.
It immediately signals something different, maybe less intimidating, more human. Absolutely.
And on the tone side, moving away from that constant fear mongering, the source suggests
leading with say optimism and clarity, speaking like a human being, not like an automated system
alert log full of jargon. Yeah, talk to people, not at them. Right. And the article really
emphasizes that tone and style aren't just like cosmetic fluff. They are critical brand
assets that demand serious strategic thought. Treating your visual style and how you speak
just as seriously as you treat your software features, that makes a lot of sense, actually.
Well, part of the experience isn't it shapes how people feel about your brand. It fundamentally
changes the perception. Yeah. Which leads us nicely into the third strategy, the article
outlines. Okay. So we've got pick your audience, your niche, find your unique voice and look.
What's the final piece of the puzzle in this source? Strategy three, develop a signature
brand asset, a signature brand asset. What does that mean exactly? The idea here is to create
something unique, valuable and memorable that people, prospects, industry folks instantly
associate with your brand name. Okay. Something concrete. Yeah. And the article provides a really
compelling example here, CrowdStrakes adversary universe. Ah, the adversary universe. I've
seen that. It's that visual interactive map thingy. Right? Tracks global threat actors
and campaigns. It's complex data, but they make it look quite digestible engaging.
Precisely. And the source loves this example because well, first, it's unique. Nobody else
has anything quite like it. Second, it's genuinely valuable to their target audience, you know,
security pros who need to understand the threat landscape. Right. It's useful. And maybe
most importantly, it is undeniably theirs. When you think of visually mapping threat actors
like that, you think CrowdStrake, it's this powerful piece of like intellectual property
and marketing all rolled into one. It's a way of showing expertise without just saying
where experts it demonstrates it. The article mentions other ideas too, right? If tracking
global adversaries isn't exactly your core business. Right. Yeah. It doesn't have to be that
complex. It could be something like a definitive annual benchmark report for your specific industry
niche. Okay. Like the report everyone waits for exactly. Or maybe a really high quality
podcast or video series that becomes a go to resource or even a dedicated mini site
that specifically breaks down threat trends relevant to different industries or use cases.
So lots of options. The key criteria for a good asset, according to the source, seem
to be that it has to be ownable, something uniquely yours. Yep. Bonable. Repeatable. So it
becomes consistent part of your identity. Mm-hmm. Repeatable. And genuinely something
that prospects come to associate directly with your name. It acts like this constant valuable
reminder of who you are and the unique insight you bring. It's a way to show your unique value
proposition, your perspective. Right. Rather than just, you know, listing features and
hoping people get it, it shifts the dynamic from just selling to providing real value upfront.
And thinking about these strategies, picking a niche, owning your look and voice, building
that unique asset, it feels valuable, not just if you're say in marketing. Understanding
these tactics helps you, the listener, navigate the sheer volume of information you see every
day. How does knowing these plays help you filter messages? Well, it gives you a critical
lens, doesn't it? When you see a company's messaging, especially in a crowded field like
cyber, you could start asking, are they talking to everyone or do they seem focused on a specific
group, maybe a group like me? Yeah. Does their style and tone feel distinct? Or could I
swap their logo with five other companies and not even notice? It's point. And crucially,
they offer something uniquely valuable like that report or tool that demonstrates their expertise.
Or is it just, you know, generic marketing fluff? It helps you identify who is genuinely
trying to build a distinct presence versus who is just, while adding to the noise, you
can more quickly spot the difference between real differentiation and just making generic
claims. Exactly. It helps you find the signal in all that noise, whether you're a buyer,
or just someone trying to stay informed. So circling back to the article's core takeaway
then, it seems to be this powerful mantra. Don't just say you're different, show it.
That really captures the whole argument. Yeah. The source kind of boils down the necessary
elements for differentiation to three things. Character, clarity and creativity. Okay. Character,
clarity, creativity. Character is about picking your unique lane, your niche, clarity is
in your message, your tone, how you speak like a human. And creativity, well, that's in your
visual identity and those signature assets you develop. Right. So to recap the big practical
strategies from this source, one, pick your specific lane, two, find and own your distinct
voice and style. And three, build that unique, memorable asset that actually provides value.
Exactly. And as you mentioned, the article kind of hints at something maybe a bit deeper.
It suggests these strategies ultimately help build a brand that actually means something.
That phrase means something that feels pretty significant, especially in a field like cybersecurity
that can be so technical, right? So focused on bits and bytes, threats, features.
It really does. What does it truly take for a brand, particularly in a highly technical,
super competitive space, to move beyond just selling a product that does X or prevents
Y to actually mean something on a, I guess, a deeper level to its audience. It's got to
be about building trust resonance, maybe even a sense of like community or a shared purpose
around solving these really critical problems. And how does understanding these differentiation
strategies, we talked about the niche, the unique voice that signature asset, how does that
change how you perceive a brand's attempt to mean something? Does that unique asset, for
instance, build a different kind of relationship or trust compared to seeing list of features?
It's a really fascinating question, I think, about how depth and character in marketing shape
are perception, even in these highly technical domains.
Reach out to us at jbuyer.com for comments and questions. Follow us at buyer company on social
media. And if you'd be so kind, please rate and review us in your podcast app.
[Music]