Welcome back to Digital Rage. I am Jeff, the producer here at Byer Company.
In this episode we are talking about AI Adaptive SEO. This is my article in
reaction to a lot of clickbait articles claiming that everything you know
about SEO is obsolete. The fundamentals of SEO are still very relevant. Even
required in order to surface an AI response. Let's dig in.
Welcome to The Deep Dive. We're here to cut through the noise and give you the
concentrated knowledge you need. And today we're tackling something big.
Sources are pretty much unanimous. This is the biggest shakeup in SEO we've
seen in what 20 years. Oh easily. It's absolutely seismic. This isn't just
you know, tweak in your H1 tags or chasing another algorithm update. We're seeing
a fundamental change in how people actually find information online. Right.
It's that shift away from just keywords. Exactly. Towards more complex
conversational questions that you ask an AI. So our mission today is to unpack this
move from the SEO we all knew focused on getting that number one ranking to what
people are now calling AI Adaptive SEO. We've got a lot of analysis here and it
all boils down to one core question really. Which is if the goal isn't hitting
number one anymore but instead becoming the trusted authoritative source that an
AI actually sites in its answer. Well what do you as a content creator need to do
differently like starting right now. That's the million dollar question isn't it
that difference ranking versus being the cited source that's the absolute heart
of this new way of thinking. Okay. But before anyone panics and throws out
everything they've learned we really need to stress that the old foundation is
still crucial. So the traditional playbook isn't dead. Not at all. Think of it
more like the the price of admission now. It gets you in the game. Okay let's nail
down those ground rules then. What are the non-negotiables? The things that
you know even allow an AI to consider your content. Well it still starts and
honestly probably still ends with user intent. AI models are getting incredibly
good at understanding not just the words someone types but what they actually
want to achieve. The underlying goal. Precisely. If your content doesn't nail
that doesn't fully satisfy what the user is trying to do solve their problem.
The AI is just going to look elsewhere and 10 is still king. Absolutely. And the
filter the AI uses for quality. That brings us back to EET right? Experience,
expertise, authoritativeness, trustworthiness. Our listeners know the acronym but
how does AI change its importance? Why does it matter more now? Ah because EET
has essentially become the AI's primary safety mechanism. Think about it.
These large language models the systems using RI retrieve a logmented
generation they're designed to prioritize established authority to avoid
mistakes. Exactly. They get penalized for making things up for hallucinations or
just spitting out low quality info. So to reduce that risk they actively hunt for
content that demonstrates real verifiable experience and deep expertise. So it's
more than just having a decent about us page now. It sounds like the AI is
actively checking cross referencing your credentials maybe your site's history
against what it already knows. That's exactly right. It's not just taking your word
for it. It's looking at your track record. Who links to you? Who sites you? The
overall quality and focus of your site. It's deciding if you're genuinely trustworthy.
Established proven authority gets cited. Thin, anonymous or low quality stuff.
That's a liability for the AI. It just gets ignored. That's a really key point.
Okay what about the technical side? Technical SEO often feels like the the less
glamorous part. Yeah. But the source is insist it's a baseline non-negotiable. If
my content and EET are solid why do I still need to obsess over core web
vigals or site structure? Doesn't the AI just read the text? It cares about
efficiency. I mean think about the sheer scale of data these models process.
Technical SEO especially speed, crawlability, clean architecture. It's essential
for the AI bots to even access and process your content efficiently. So if my site
slow or messy? The bot just moves on. Why would it waste computing power trying to
untangle a slow confusing site when there are thousands of other authoritative
sites that are technically perfect? It's a prerequisite now. Technical
excellence gets you seen. Okay foundation established authority verified
intent satisfied sites fast. Now let's dig into the big strategic pivot. This is
where it gets really interesting moving from that old goal. Number one rank
maybe the featured snippet to what we're calling the site worthy content
strategy. The new game is creating a resource that's so definitive, so well
structured that when the AI builds its answer for a user it chooses your
content as the reference link. It points back to you, which means rethinking how
we approach topics right moving beyond just clusters of keywords.
Absolutely. We have to optimize for entire concepts now building real
topical authority. Explain that a bit more. The old way was. The old way was
often spray and pray right 10 slightly different articles to catch 10
slightly different keyword variations. Right. But AI doesn't just match
keywords anymore. It understands the deeper connections, the semantics
between all the ideas within a whole topic. So the new approach is one
definitive guide. Pretty much. Instead of 10 thin pieces you build one
comprehensive pillar style resource. Something that covers the core topic from
well every angle. You proactively answer the main questions, the follow up
questions, the what ifs. And that signals reliability to the AI.
It signals completeness. These RRAG system are designed to synthesize
information. If you provide the most complete reliable picture in one place,
you stop being just a collection of keyword targeted pages and you start
becoming a true authority on the subject. Okay, I get the authority angle.
But let me push back slightly. If I create one monster guide, won't that page be huge?
Potentially slow. Doesn't that hurt my core web vitals? The very thing we just said
was crucial. That's a fair point. And it's where structure becomes
absolutely paramount. You can't just dump 10,000 words onto a page. You need smart
structure like using internal jump links, clear headings, maybe concise
summaries at the top. Really clean code is essential too. And remember,
topical authority isn't just about length. It's about completeness and value.
Every section has to deliver. So depth is good, but it has to be well organized
and fast. Exactly. The AI is sophisticated. It can appreciate the depth.
But only if the technical side, the delivery mechanism is smooth and fast.
Right. Makes sense. Okay, so that brings us to the real nuts and bolts.
If the goal is to be site worthy, what are the practical steps?
The mechanics of structuring content so an AI can easily almost automatically pull
information out and attribute it correctly. We're talking machine efficiency here.
You've nailed it. That's the philosophical shift. You're essentially building a reference
document specifically for an AI model. Meaning, meaning your content needs
clear factual statements. Things that are easy to verify.
The machine doesn't want to wade through paragraphs of flowery prose to find one simple data point.
It wants the facts cleanly presented. And what specific structures make that happen?
Make extraction easy. This is where specific formatting tools become critical.
We're talking about leveraging things like bullet points, numbered lists,
detailed comparison tables and really clear definition. Job, why those specifically?
Because they're formatting gold for an AI. They are super easy to parse, easy to extract,
specific pieces of information from. And this is key, easy for the AI to attribute back to you
accurately. So if you can pull a perfect quote from a bullet point or a table cell.
The risk of it misinterpreting or hallucinating drops significantly, which makes the AI much more
likely to choose your content to cite. So simplifying complex ideas into say a bulleted list
isn't just for human readers anymore. It's a strategic choice for the AI.
It absolutely is. And tied into that is building what some call the web of trust.
It's not just about presenting data. You need to cite your own sources within your content.
Show the machine your homework. Demonstrating rigor. Exactly. That internal rigor signals the AI
that your information is well researched, verified, reliable. It just builds confidence.
It makes the AI more comfortable using you as a primary reference.
Makes sense. Make it easy to cite. Make it trustworthy to cite.
And I can see how this connects to how search feels more conversational now.
You ask one question. You usually have follow-ups in mind.
Precisely. AI search tries to anticipate that next step.
Think about the people also ask box in Google search results.
That's a basic version of this conversational flow.
So that box is actually a gold mine. It's a gold mine for understanding the PAS users take.
Your content needs to do the same thing. Answer the main question, sure.
But then proactively answer those likely secondary tertiary follow-up questions.
If you do that, you become the go-to source the AI keeps coming back to within that single user
session. We've covered content structure, citing sources. Now let's talk about guiding the
machine more explicitly. The source material really hammers home that schema markup has gone from,
like a nice to have bonus to a critical requirement for this AI adaptive SEL.
Why such a big jump in importance.
Okay, think of schema as like the detailed nutritional label on your food packaging,
but for your content. The AI bot doesn't want to guess what it's looking at.
It wants the facts up front. Exactly.
schema gives the bot a guided tour. You're explicitly telling it.
This section here is a definition. This part is a step-by-step how-to guide.
Here are the authors credentials. These are FAQs.
So simply using the basic article schema isn't really cutting it anymore. We need to get more
specific. You absolutely must. Basic article schema just says, "This is an article." Okay, fine.
But detailed schema like FAQ page schema. That gives the AI the exact question and answer
pairs it needs for clean attribution. How-to schema structures the steps perfectly?
It takes the guesswork out. Completely. It removes ambiguity for the AI.
It guarantees the machine understands the purpose and structure of your information,
which dramatically boosts your chances of being selected and cited correctly,
especially for those structured answers AI often generates.
The message seems loud and clear. If you don't explicitly label your content for the AI,
it might not know how to use it properly or it might just skip it.
Okay, this has been a really solid framework for everyone listening,
nodding along, thinking about their own site. What are, say, the top three actionable things they
should prioritize, like this week. Okay, three things. First, conduct a real topical authority audit.
Pick your main subject areas, maybe your top three. Map out all your existing content against those
topics. Where are the gaps? Yes, in terms of gaps in covering those secondary and tertiary
questions. Maybe you've covered the what is X really well, but you completely missed the,
how do I use X or the why should I care about X compared to why? Find those gaps and fill them
aim for completeness. Got it. Step one, audit for completeness. What's number two?
Number two, optimize your existing high performers for site worthiness. Look at the pages that
already get traffic that already rank reasonably well. Go into those pages specifically looking for
opportunity. Like taking a dense paragraph, explaining a concept and breaking the key takeaways into
a bulleted list or finding comparisons and putting them into a simple table, adding specific
data points with sources basically make it incredibly easy for an AI to grab a perfect self-contained,
a attributable quote. Effortless extraction. That seems to be the mantra. Okay, and the third action
item. What about new content? For new content, target explanation queries. Really focus your creation
efforts on those in-depth conversational answers. The how, the why, the what is type questions. Why
those specifically? Because that's where AI often shines providing detailed explanations. If you
can create the most comprehensive, the most verifiable, the best structured explanation for those core
informational queries, you position yourself as the go-to reference source that the AI will naturally
gravitate towards. Commercial content will evolve sure, but the need for clear authoritative explanations
isn't going away. It really sounds like this AI adaptive approach isn't some passing fad. It's
the next chapter for SEO, isn't it? And taking your solid traditional SEO foundation and layering
on this focus on, well, citation mechanics, that seems like the key to getting ahead right now.
Absolutely. It's about understanding how the machine works, its constraints, its priorities,
like avoiding errors and citing reliably, and then building your content to meet those needs,
be the best, most verifiable, and crucially the most easily attributable answer out there.
So let's zoom out for a final thought. What does all this really mean? If these AI systems are
fundamentally designed to reward EAT, to reward clear structure, to reward meticulous sourcing.
Does becoming AI adaptive essentially mean we're being pushed back towards a higher standard,
maybe even more like academic rigor, but for all online content? Is the machine, ironically,
forcing us all to be better researchers and clearer writers? Something for you to think about is
you start auditing your own topics. Thanks for joining us for this deep dive.
Reach out to us at jbuyer.com for comments and questions. Follow us at buyer company on social media,
and if you'd be so kind, please rate and review us in your podcast app.