1
00:00:00,333 --> 00:00:02,041
 Two of the most well known, most

2
00:00:02,041 --> 00:00:04,208
 respected marketers and copywriters in

3
00:00:04,208 --> 00:00:05,916
 our industry just had a

4
00:00:05,916 --> 00:00:07,791
 very public falling out.

5
00:00:08,125 --> 00:00:09,333
 And it all started with a

6
00:00:09,333 --> 00:00:11,583
 single AI generated image.

7
00:00:12,125 --> 00:00:14,083
 Now I know both of these people

8
00:00:14,083 --> 00:00:16,333
 personally and I respect both of them.

9
00:00:16,333 --> 00:00:18,250
 And I'm not here to pick sides, but what

10
00:00:18,250 --> 00:00:21,000
 happened between them raised a question

11
00:00:21,000 --> 00:00:22,708
 that I think every single one

12
00:00:22,708 --> 00:00:25,083
 of us using AI needs to answer.

13
00:00:25,750 --> 00:00:28,250
 If AI creates something on your behalf

14
00:00:28,250 --> 00:00:30,625
 that causes harm, who's responsible?

15
00:00:31,666 --> 00:00:32,333
 That's what we're going to be digging

16
00:01:18,541 --> 00:01:20,833
 first is Frank Kern, who's been in the

17
00:01:20,833 --> 00:01:22,708
 internet marketing game for decades.

18
00:01:23,250 --> 00:01:26,083
 The second is Alex Katoni, who runs Copy

19
00:01:26,083 --> 00:01:27,833
 Posse and has built a huge

20
00:01:27,833 --> 00:01:29,666
 brand teaching copywriting.

21
00:01:30,041 --> 00:01:32,541
 Now both are elite level marketers.

22
00:01:33,208 --> 00:01:34,875
 Both are people that I know personally.

23
00:01:35,375 --> 00:01:36,500
 Alex is a member of my

24
00:01:36,500 --> 00:01:38,375
 highest level mastermind, Impact.

25
00:01:38,708 --> 00:01:39,708
 So I know her.

26
00:01:39,708 --> 00:01:40,583
 She's a dear friend.

27
00:01:41,291 --> 00:01:42,166
 Frank is someone that

28
00:01:42,166 --> 00:01:43,583
 I've known for over 20 years.

29
00:01:43,750 --> 00:01:45,291
 I've purchased tens of thousands of

30
00:01:45,291 --> 00:01:46,458
 dollars of his trainings.

31
00:01:47,000 --> 00:01:47,875
 Now here's the situation.

32
00:01:48,750 --> 00:01:50,291
 Frank has an AI copywriting

33
00:01:50,291 --> 00:01:52,416
 tool and he ran an ad for it.

34
00:01:52,750 --> 00:01:55,833
 The ad included an AI generated image of

35
00:01:55,833 --> 00:01:57,000
 a woman in a red

36
00:01:57,000 --> 00:01:58,625
 string bikini on a beach.

37
00:01:59,291 --> 00:02:02,166
 The problem is that image looked almost

38
00:02:02,166 --> 00:02:05,416
 identical to Alex Katoni and people were

39
00:02:05,416 --> 00:02:07,583
 DMing Alex saying, is that you?

40
00:02:08,125 --> 00:02:11,125
 Now Alex's response to all this, she did

41
00:02:11,125 --> 00:02:13,791
 a little digging and ultimately she was

42
00:02:13,791 --> 00:02:16,041
 furious and she posted a

43
00:02:16,041 --> 00:02:18,375
 video calling Frank out publicly.

44
00:02:18,750 --> 00:02:20,500
 She was upset and rightfully so.

45
00:02:21,791 --> 00:02:24,125
 Even seeing what looks like your face in

46
00:02:24,125 --> 00:02:28,041
 a bikini being used to promote a product

47
00:02:28,041 --> 00:02:29,416
 in the copywriting

48
00:02:29,416 --> 00:02:31,416
 space, which is her market.

49
00:02:32,000 --> 00:02:32,541
 That's not okay.

50
00:02:33,166 --> 00:02:35,750
 Now Frank's response is he posted a video

51
00:02:35,750 --> 00:02:38,583
 showing the prompt that he used showing

52
00:02:38,583 --> 00:02:41,250
 that the prompt didn't mention Alex by

53
00:02:41,250 --> 00:02:44,041
 name showing multiple regenerations of

54
00:02:44,041 --> 00:02:45,375
 the image that all

55
00:02:45,375 --> 00:02:46,500
 look slightly different.

56
00:02:47,250 --> 00:02:49,333
 He said it was a coincidence and he also

57
00:02:49,333 --> 00:02:51,916
 said that he was not apologizing because

58
00:02:51,916 --> 00:02:53,833
 he didn't believe he did anything wrong.

59
00:02:54,875 --> 00:02:56,333
 Now the fallout from this has really been

60
00:02:56,333 --> 00:02:57,416
 the people in the comments.

61
00:02:57,666 --> 00:02:58,333
 I mean people were

62
00:02:58,333 --> 00:03:00,291
 comparing Frank to Jeffrey Epstein.

63
00:03:00,791 --> 00:03:01,625
 Others made threats

64
00:03:01,625 --> 00:03:02,958
 against his wife and daughters.

65
00:03:03,208 --> 00:03:05,500
 It got ugly fast and not only that, but

66
00:03:05,500 --> 00:03:06,416
 the opposite was true.

67
00:03:06,750 --> 00:03:08,541
 People were also saying some really ugly

68
00:03:08,541 --> 00:03:10,166
 things about Alex in the

69
00:03:10,166 --> 00:03:11,625
 comments of Frank's video.

70
00:03:12,166 --> 00:03:14,041
 Now here's my belief on this whole thing.

71
00:03:14,333 --> 00:03:16,458
 I believe Frank didn't do it on purpose.

72
00:03:16,875 --> 00:03:19,333
 I do think it was a coincidence, but I

73
00:03:19,333 --> 00:03:21,416
 also believe that Alex had every right to

74
00:03:21,416 --> 00:03:23,291
 be upset and I think the real

75
00:03:23,291 --> 00:03:24,833
 conversation here is much

76
00:03:24,833 --> 00:03:27,541
 bigger than this ongoing feud.

77
00:03:28,041 --> 00:03:30,458
 This isn't really about Frank or Alex.

78
00:03:30,833 --> 00:03:33,916
 This is about you and me and every person

79
00:03:33,916 --> 00:03:36,041
 using AI in their business right now

80
00:03:36,041 --> 00:03:38,625
 because there are three big lessons here

81
00:03:38,625 --> 00:03:40,458
 that I think we all need

82
00:03:40,458 --> 00:03:42,833
 to take time to think about.

83
00:03:43,625 --> 00:03:46,333
 Reason number one, you are responsible

84
00:03:46,333 --> 00:03:49,583
 for what AI creates on your behalf.

85
00:03:50,791 --> 00:03:51,958
 AI is like an employee.

86
00:03:52,291 --> 00:03:54,541
 If you hire someone and they do something

87
00:03:54,541 --> 00:03:56,791
 wrong while working for you, you can't

88
00:03:56,791 --> 00:03:59,166
 just say, "Hey, that was them, not me."

89
00:04:00,083 --> 00:04:01,041
 You're the boss.

90
00:04:01,375 --> 00:04:02,666
 You signed off on it.

91
00:04:02,833 --> 00:04:03,791
 You published it.

92
00:04:04,125 --> 00:04:05,166
 Same thing with AI.

93
00:04:05,750 --> 00:04:07,916
 Think of it like a contractor who is

94
00:04:07,916 --> 00:04:08,791
 building your house.

95
00:04:09,458 --> 00:04:12,000
 If the contractor installs faulty wiring

96
00:04:12,000 --> 00:04:14,208
 and the house catches fire, you can't

97
00:04:14,208 --> 00:04:16,166
 tell the insurance company, "Well, I

98
00:04:16,166 --> 00:04:17,166
 didn't install the wiring.

99
00:04:17,791 --> 00:04:18,333
 You were the one that

100
00:04:18,333 --> 00:04:19,083
 hired the contractor.

101
00:04:19,500 --> 00:04:20,500
 You approved the work.

102
00:04:20,958 --> 00:04:22,625
 You're responsible for the output."

103
00:04:23,708 --> 00:04:24,958
 Frank's position in this video was

104
00:04:24,958 --> 00:04:27,000
 essentially, "I'm not apologizing because

105
00:04:27,000 --> 00:04:28,083
 I didn't do anything wrong."

106
00:04:28,833 --> 00:04:29,708
 Look, I get it.

107
00:04:29,708 --> 00:04:30,958
 He didn't type Alex's

108
00:04:30,958 --> 00:04:31,875
 name into the prompt.

109
00:04:32,166 --> 00:04:33,916
 He didn't upload her photo,

110
00:04:34,125 --> 00:04:35,833
 but he did publish the image.

111
00:04:36,458 --> 00:04:38,500
 He put it out into the world as an ad for

112
00:04:38,500 --> 00:04:40,750
 his product, and that's where the

113
00:04:40,750 --> 00:04:42,166
 responsibility kicks in.

114
00:04:42,750 --> 00:04:44,916
 See, when you use AI to create content,

115
00:04:45,208 --> 00:04:47,916
 images, copy, anything, the moment you

116
00:04:47,916 --> 00:04:49,500
 hit publish, it's yours.

117
00:04:49,833 --> 00:04:50,583
 You own it.

118
00:04:51,041 --> 00:04:53,000
 It was AI is not a defense.

119
00:04:53,416 --> 00:04:54,583
 It's the new like, "The

120
00:04:54,583 --> 00:04:56,208
 dog ate my homework," right?

121
00:04:56,791 --> 00:04:57,750
 Now, here's what's interesting.

122
00:04:58,166 --> 00:05:00,416
 A study from the Nuremberg Institute for

123
00:05:00,416 --> 00:05:02,458
 Market Decisions found that when

124
00:05:02,458 --> 00:05:05,125
 consumers find out content was made by

125
00:05:05,125 --> 00:05:08,708
 AI, their trust in the ad and the company

126
00:05:08,708 --> 00:05:10,000
 behind it goes down.

127
00:05:10,625 --> 00:05:12,958
 Not only are you responsible, but your

128
00:05:12,958 --> 00:05:16,083
 audience is already more skeptical of AI

129
00:05:16,083 --> 00:05:18,125
 content to begin with, and you can't

130
00:05:18,125 --> 00:05:19,416
 afford to be careless.

131
00:05:20,083 --> 00:05:20,708
 Does this make sense?

132
00:05:21,500 --> 00:05:23,416
 You and I need to own what we put out

133
00:05:23,416 --> 00:05:24,583
 there, regardless of the

134
00:05:24,583 --> 00:05:26,041
 tool that we use to make it.

135
00:05:26,250 --> 00:05:26,708
 Is that right?

136
00:05:27,166 --> 00:05:27,333
 Okay.

137
00:05:27,791 --> 00:05:28,875
 Lesson number two,

138
00:05:29,041 --> 00:05:30,458
 review before you

139
00:05:30,458 --> 00:05:33,333
 publish every single time.

140
00:05:34,166 --> 00:05:36,458
 The real failure here wasn't that AI

141
00:05:36,458 --> 00:05:37,666
 generated an image

142
00:05:37,666 --> 00:05:38,750
 that looked like someone.

143
00:05:39,000 --> 00:05:39,875
 AI does that.

144
00:05:40,291 --> 00:05:42,541
 The real failure was that nobody caught

145
00:05:42,541 --> 00:05:43,625
 it before it went live.

146
00:05:44,041 --> 00:05:46,166
 when you look at the actual prompt that

147
00:05:46,166 --> 00:05:48,666
 Frank used, it asked for a beautiful,

148
00:05:49,041 --> 00:05:52,250
 super sexy Caucasian woman with flowing

149
00:05:52,250 --> 00:05:53,833
 brown hair and bright blue

150
00:05:53,833 --> 00:05:55,750
 eyes in a red string bikini.

151
00:05:56,583 --> 00:05:59,291
 Now, regardless of whether you think that

152
00:05:59,291 --> 00:06:01,708
 kind of a prompt was appropriate or not,

153
00:06:02,250 --> 00:06:05,416
 the problem is that if you are prompting

154
00:06:05,416 --> 00:06:08,416
 AI, you are responsible for

155
00:06:08,416 --> 00:06:10,791
 what AI ultimately creates.

156
00:06:11,583 --> 00:06:13,250
 That is a choice that is made.

157
00:06:13,916 --> 00:06:16,708
 The choice of what to use in the prompt

158
00:06:16,708 --> 00:06:18,375
 and the choice of whether

159
00:06:18,375 --> 00:06:20,208
 you're going to use the output.

160
00:06:20,708 --> 00:06:21,333
 I want you to think of

161
00:06:21,333 --> 00:06:22,125
 it like proofreading.

162
00:06:23,041 --> 00:06:24,666
 Before you send an important email to a

163
00:06:24,666 --> 00:06:25,958
 client, you read it twice.

164
00:06:26,458 --> 00:06:27,333
 You check for typos.

165
00:06:27,708 --> 00:06:28,458
 You check for tone.

166
00:06:28,833 --> 00:06:29,875
 You make sure nothing in

167
00:06:29,875 --> 00:06:31,000
 there could be misread.

168
00:06:31,666 --> 00:06:34,500
 See, AI output deserves the same level of

169
00:06:34,500 --> 00:06:37,000
 review, maybe even more because AI

170
00:06:37,000 --> 00:06:37,875
 doesn't have the common

171
00:06:37,875 --> 00:06:39,250
 sense that you and I have.

172
00:06:39,250 --> 00:06:40,666
 It doesn't know that the image it

173
00:06:40,666 --> 00:06:41,875
 generated looks like a

174
00:06:41,875 --> 00:06:43,541
 real person in your industry.

175
00:06:44,291 --> 00:06:47,333
 Before publishing any AI generated image,

176
00:06:47,916 --> 00:06:50,125
 I want you to ask the question, does this

177
00:06:50,125 --> 00:06:51,541
 look like a real person?

178
00:06:52,208 --> 00:06:53,583
 Could someone think of

179
00:06:53,583 --> 00:06:55,125
 this as someone specific?

180
00:06:55,833 --> 00:06:58,458
 Before publishing any AI generated copy,

181
00:06:58,958 --> 00:06:59,416
 you got to ask

182
00:06:59,416 --> 00:07:00,958
 yourself, is this accurate?

183
00:07:01,458 --> 00:07:02,291
 Could it be misread?

184
00:07:02,750 --> 00:07:04,583
 Does it align with my values?

185
00:07:05,250 --> 00:07:07,375
 The simple gut check, would I be

186
00:07:07,375 --> 00:07:08,958
 comfortable if this went

187
00:07:08,958 --> 00:07:11,291
 viral for the wrong reasons?

188
00:07:11,625 --> 00:07:14,833
 That right there will tell you whether AI

189
00:07:14,833 --> 00:07:16,958
 is appropriate to be published.

190
00:07:17,333 --> 00:07:18,666
 Now, there were all kinds of comments,

191
00:07:18,666 --> 00:07:19,541
 but one that stood out

192
00:07:19,541 --> 00:07:20,833
 to me was Morgan Knox.

193
00:07:21,458 --> 00:07:23,166
 I'm paraphrasing here, but she basically

194
00:07:23,166 --> 00:07:25,458
 said, "If you're a designer and you

195
00:07:25,458 --> 00:07:27,750
 create a logo and it goes public and

196
00:07:27,750 --> 00:07:29,291
 people start pointing out that there's

197
00:07:29,291 --> 00:07:30,500
 something inappropriate in

198
00:07:30,500 --> 00:07:32,083
 it, did you do a good job?

199
00:07:32,541 --> 00:07:33,833
 Your intentions don't

200
00:07:33,833 --> 00:07:35,250
 matter as much as the impact.

201
00:07:35,916 --> 00:07:37,375
 When the public sees it and has a

202
00:07:37,375 --> 00:07:38,833
 reaction, that's what counts."

203
00:07:39,541 --> 00:07:41,291
 And there's research that ties this in.

204
00:07:41,625 --> 00:07:44,166
 Getty Images surveyed over 30,000 adults

205
00:07:44,166 --> 00:07:46,625
 across 25 countries and found that nearly

206
00:07:46,625 --> 00:07:50,125
 90% of consumers want to know whether an

207
00:07:50,125 --> 00:07:52,000
 image was created using AI.

208
00:07:52,583 --> 00:07:53,416
 See, people are paying

209
00:07:53,416 --> 00:07:54,416
 attention to this stuff.

210
00:07:54,416 --> 00:07:55,416
 They care about it.

211
00:07:55,416 --> 00:07:57,416
 So, you and I need to care about it too.

212
00:07:57,708 --> 00:07:58,583
 You following me on this?

213
00:07:59,083 --> 00:08:01,333
 The review step is where most people are

214
00:08:01,333 --> 00:08:03,500
 dropping the ball with AI right now and

215
00:08:03,500 --> 00:08:04,541
 we've got to clean it up.

216
00:08:05,083 --> 00:08:06,541
 Okay, lesson number three.

217
00:08:06,833 --> 00:08:09,625
 When conflict happens, go direct first.

218
00:08:09,916 --> 00:08:12,166
 In hindsight, I think the better move

219
00:08:12,166 --> 00:08:13,875
 would have been for Alex to reach out to

220
00:08:13,875 --> 00:08:16,000
 Frank directly before posting publicly.

221
00:08:16,333 --> 00:08:18,166
 And I say that with full respect for Alex

222
00:08:18,166 --> 00:08:19,083
 and full understanding

223
00:08:19,083 --> 00:08:20,333
 of why she was upset.

224
00:08:20,666 --> 00:08:21,625
 She had every right to

225
00:08:21,625 --> 00:08:22,541
 feel the way that she felt.

226
00:08:22,916 --> 00:08:24,708
 Frank and Alex both have dozens of mutual

227
00:08:24,708 --> 00:08:26,666
 friends and any one of those people could

228
00:08:26,666 --> 00:08:27,500
 have picked up the phone.

229
00:08:27,750 --> 00:08:29,375
 And Frank even said in his video that he

230
00:08:29,375 --> 00:08:30,333
 would have taken the post down

231
00:08:30,333 --> 00:08:32,333
 immediately, no questions asked if

232
00:08:32,333 --> 00:08:33,333
 someone had just told him.

233
00:08:33,500 --> 00:08:35,041
 And by the way, he did take it down the

234
00:08:35,041 --> 00:08:36,208
 moment he found out.

235
00:08:36,500 --> 00:08:38,916
 But once something goes public, you and I

236
00:08:38,916 --> 00:08:40,375
 lose control of the narrative.

237
00:08:40,833 --> 00:08:42,916
 The comments section became a war zone.

238
00:08:43,333 --> 00:08:44,125
 People were comparing

239
00:08:44,125 --> 00:08:45,458
 Frank to Jeffrey Epstein.

240
00:08:45,666 --> 00:08:47,333
 People were threatening his family.

241
00:08:47,916 --> 00:08:50,041
 And the opposite was also true.

242
00:08:50,041 --> 00:08:50,958
 People were saying super

243
00:08:50,958 --> 00:08:52,708
 ugly things about Alex as well.

244
00:08:53,125 --> 00:08:55,833
 And that's way beyond the original issue.

245
00:08:56,166 --> 00:08:58,125
 And once that genie gets out of the

246
00:08:58,125 --> 00:08:59,541
 bottle, you can't pull it back.

247
00:09:00,208 --> 00:09:02,291
 See, whether it's a business partner, a

248
00:09:02,291 --> 00:09:04,416
 competitor, a team member, or a fellow

249
00:09:04,416 --> 00:09:06,958
 creator, when there's conflict, the first

250
00:09:06,958 --> 00:09:08,541
 move should always be

251
00:09:08,541 --> 00:09:09,583
 a private conversation.

252
00:09:09,916 --> 00:09:12,166
 Give the other person a chance to make it

253
00:09:12,166 --> 00:09:13,750
 right before you take it public.

254
00:09:14,000 --> 00:09:15,458
 Now I want to highlight something that

255
00:09:15,458 --> 00:09:16,791
 Alex said in her follow up

256
00:09:16,791 --> 00:09:18,166
 video to Frank's response.

257
00:09:18,541 --> 00:09:19,875
 And that I think was actually really

258
00:09:19,875 --> 00:09:21,166
 mature and really important.

259
00:09:21,708 --> 00:09:23,791
 She said that she believes Frank when he

260
00:09:23,791 --> 00:09:24,791
 said it wasn't intentional.

261
00:09:25,041 --> 00:09:26,791
 And that she pivoted to the real

262
00:09:26,791 --> 00:09:29,541
 conversation, which is where is the line

263
00:09:29,541 --> 00:09:31,291
 with using AI and marketing?

264
00:09:31,625 --> 00:09:33,875
 And what precedent does this set?

265
00:09:34,625 --> 00:09:36,541
 Where does accountability land?

266
00:09:36,916 --> 00:09:38,125
 Those are the right questions.

267
00:09:38,666 --> 00:09:41,375
 She was questioning more about Frank's

268
00:09:41,375 --> 00:09:44,291
 intention of using a woman in a red

269
00:09:44,291 --> 00:09:46,041
 string bikini to sell

270
00:09:46,041 --> 00:09:47,916
 an AI copywriting tool.

271
00:09:48,666 --> 00:09:51,875
 And she's trying to raise a bigger

272
00:09:51,875 --> 00:09:53,375
 conversation that I

273
00:09:53,375 --> 00:09:54,541
 think is important as well.

274
00:09:54,708 --> 00:09:56,041
 It's like being in a restaurant and

275
00:09:56,041 --> 00:09:57,208
 getting the wrong order.

276
00:09:57,583 --> 00:09:58,375
 You don't stand up and

277
00:09:58,375 --> 00:09:59,750
 announce it to the whole restaurant.

278
00:09:59,750 --> 00:10:01,333
 You talk to your server first, right?

279
00:10:01,666 --> 00:10:04,125
 You give them a chance to fix it and 99

280
00:10:04,125 --> 00:10:05,500
 times out of 100, they will.

281
00:10:06,041 --> 00:10:09,291
 Going public first skips that step and it

282
00:10:09,291 --> 00:10:10,500
 creates a mess that

283
00:10:10,500 --> 00:10:11,541
 didn't need to happen.

284
00:10:12,000 --> 00:10:13,541
 Well, I know this one was a little

285
00:10:13,541 --> 00:10:15,291
 sensitive, but I think it's important for

286
00:10:15,291 --> 00:10:17,166
 all of us to think about how we handle

287
00:10:17,166 --> 00:10:19,083
 conflict, especially in a world where

288
00:10:19,083 --> 00:10:21,333
 everything can go viral in minutes.

289
00:10:21,666 --> 00:10:22,666
 So here's what I want you to do.

290
00:10:23,000 --> 00:10:24,875
 The next time you use AI to create

291
00:10:24,875 --> 00:10:26,541
 something, whether it's an image, a piece

292
00:10:26,541 --> 00:10:28,958
 of copy, a social post, whatever, I want

293
00:10:28,958 --> 00:10:30,625
 you to pause before you hit publish.

294
00:10:31,000 --> 00:10:31,750
 And I want you to ask

295
00:10:31,750 --> 00:10:33,000
 these three questions.

296
00:10:33,583 --> 00:10:35,291
 Number one, am I proud of this?

297
00:10:35,958 --> 00:10:37,333
 Number two, could this

298
00:10:37,333 --> 00:10:39,291
 be misread or cause harm?

299
00:10:39,833 --> 00:10:41,333
 And number three, would I be

300
00:10:41,333 --> 00:10:43,541
 comfortable if this went viral?

301
00:10:44,083 --> 00:10:46,083
 If the answer to any one of those makes

302
00:10:46,083 --> 00:10:47,958
 you hesitate, then fix it

303
00:10:47,958 --> 00:10:49,291
 before it goes out the door

304
00:10:49,625 --> 00:10:50,541
 So let's wrap this up.

305
00:10:51,125 --> 00:10:52,541
 Three things to take away from the Frank

306
00:10:52,541 --> 00:10:54,583
 Kern and Alex Katoni situation.

307
00:10:54,791 --> 00:10:57,625
 Number one, you are responsible for what

308
00:10:57,625 --> 00:10:59,166
 AI creates on your behalf.

309
00:10:59,875 --> 00:11:01,333
 AI is just the tool.

310
00:11:02,000 --> 00:11:03,416
 You are the one that is hitting publish.

311
00:11:03,833 --> 00:11:04,541
 So own it.

312
00:11:05,166 --> 00:11:06,375
 Number two, review

313
00:11:06,375 --> 00:11:08,291
 everything before it goes live.

314
00:11:08,958 --> 00:11:10,666
 AI does not have the same

315
00:11:10,666 --> 00:11:12,333
 judgment that you and I have.

316
00:11:12,833 --> 00:11:14,541
 So make sure you use your

317
00:11:14,541 --> 00:11:16,250
 judgment before you hit publish.

318
00:11:17,041 --> 00:11:18,416
 And number three, when

319
00:11:18,416 --> 00:11:20,875
 conflict happens, go direct first.

320
00:11:21,291 --> 00:11:23,458
 A private conversation almost always

321
00:11:23,458 --> 00:11:24,625
 leads to a better

322
00:11:24,625 --> 00:11:26,458
 outcome than a public callout.

323
00:11:27,083 --> 00:11:27,916
 At the end of the day,

324
00:11:28,208 --> 00:11:29,833
 AI is incredibly powerful.

325
00:11:30,125 --> 00:11:31,916
 It's going to keep getting more powerful,

326
00:11:31,916 --> 00:11:34,500
 but the responsibility for how we use it,

327
00:11:35,000 --> 00:11:35,833
 that's what stays with us.

328
00:11:36,083 --> 00:11:36,958
 And it always will.

329
00:11:37,500 --> 00:11:38,750
 Now, do I have all the answers when it

330
00:11:38,750 --> 00:11:39,833
 comes to AI and ethics?

331
00:11:40,041 --> 00:11:41,291
 Heck no, definitely not.

332
00:11:41,541 --> 00:11:43,291
 But my hope is that this conversation

333
00:11:43,291 --> 00:11:45,625
 helps you think a little more carefully

334
00:11:45,625 --> 00:11:47,500
 about what you put out into the world,

335
00:11:47,708 --> 00:11:49,708
 because the more thoughtful we are with

336
00:11:49,708 --> 00:11:52,750
 those tools, the more trust we build and

337
00:11:52,750 --> 00:11:55,375
 trust in today's world is everything.

338
00:11:56,041 --> 00:11:57,541
 Listen, I want to thank you for listening

339
00:11:57,541 --> 00:11:58,916
 and I want to encourage you.

340
00:11:58,916 --> 00:12:00,541
 If you like the show, please

341
00:12:00,541 --> 00:12:02,833
 go and rate it and review it.

342
00:12:03,291 --> 00:12:05,166
 And heck, maybe even share it with a

343
00:12:05,166 --> 00:12:07,333
 friend and always remember, the

