1
00:00:00,000 --> 00:00:02,250
Daniel Rowles: Welcome back to the
Digital Marketing Podcast, brought

2
00:00:02,250 --> 00:00:03,780
to you by target internet.com.

3
00:00:04,320 --> 00:00:07,200
My name's Daniel Rolls, and in
this episode we are talking about

4
00:00:07,200 --> 00:00:08,760
dealing with exponential change.

5
00:00:17,096 --> 00:00:20,126
So we all know that AI is driving
levels of change that we've never

6
00:00:20,126 --> 00:00:23,706
really dealt with before, and it's
making everyone struggle to keep

7
00:00:23,706 --> 00:00:26,196
up to date with things even worse
than we've ever had in marketing.

8
00:00:26,946 --> 00:00:30,636
So I once to explore in this episode
with the help of Jeff Tuff, who is

9
00:00:30,636 --> 00:00:34,686
consulting principal at Deloitte and
author of numerous books, including his

10
00:00:34,686 --> 00:00:38,981
latest hone on how we can practically
deal with this level of change.

11
00:00:40,371 --> 00:00:44,841
Now, as you might be aware, I head up the
Digital Transformation Strategy program

12
00:00:44,841 --> 00:00:49,221
at Imperial College, but one of the
challenges we often face as marketers,

13
00:00:49,221 --> 00:00:54,171
leaders, or entrepreneurs is that we can't
really institute a major change project.

14
00:00:54,801 --> 00:00:57,141
We might also feel like it's
not particularly the solution.

15
00:00:57,141 --> 00:01:02,271
Anyway, so for that reason, Jeff's new
book Hone How Purposeful Leaders Defy

16
00:01:02,271 --> 00:01:07,071
Drift, which he co-wrote with Steven
Goldberg, deloitte's sustainability

17
00:01:07,071 --> 00:01:11,421
business lead in the US was so
interesting as it explores how we

18
00:01:11,421 --> 00:01:16,971
build systems and processes into our
organizations, both large and small.

19
00:01:16,971 --> 00:01:20,451
And it really does apply to
all organizations how we can

20
00:01:20,451 --> 00:01:22,761
help deal with ongoing change.

21
00:01:23,361 --> 00:01:26,151
And I thought there's some real
nuggets in here that will help us.

22
00:01:26,661 --> 00:01:31,131
Hopefully baking innovation, baking
change into what we're doing every

23
00:01:31,131 --> 00:01:36,681
day, meaning that hopefully this level
of exponential change won't disrupt

24
00:01:36,681 --> 00:01:42,111
us because actually as you hear from
the book, how do we go through and

25
00:01:42,111 --> 00:01:43,851
deal with this on an ongoing basis?

26
00:01:44,391 --> 00:01:46,401
So over to the interview.

27
00:01:48,852 --> 00:01:50,052
So I'm here with Jeff.

28
00:01:50,052 --> 00:01:53,142
So Jeff, I mean, I think it's a
particularly relevant time, but why

29
00:01:53,142 --> 00:01:56,172
does hone feel especially relevant
for things right now, do you think?

30
00:01:56,689 --> 00:01:57,169
Geoff Tuff: Hone.

31
00:01:57,269 --> 00:02:00,419
It originated when Steve and I
first started talking about the book

32
00:02:00,469 --> 00:02:04,309
there lots of different ways we were
conceiving of it, but one, impetus

33
00:02:04,309 --> 00:02:07,219
for the book is we wanted it to
be the antidote to transformation.

34
00:02:07,339 --> 00:02:11,439
And so I, you know, if I had to
characterize what I hear from just

35
00:02:11,439 --> 00:02:13,959
about every single client we serve
these days or all of the account teams

36
00:02:13,959 --> 00:02:17,309
who serve our clients, it's that their
clients need to go and un undergo a

37
00:02:17,309 --> 00:02:19,229
transformation for whatever reason.

38
00:02:19,739 --> 00:02:22,499
Most of the time, the reason is
because they're being impacted

39
00:02:22,499 --> 00:02:25,919
by some set of forces, either
internal or external, that are.

40
00:02:26,279 --> 00:02:28,469
More powerful than anything
they've seen before.

41
00:02:28,469 --> 00:02:31,979
I've done a lot of thinking and writing
and talking about the power of exponential

42
00:02:31,979 --> 00:02:35,909
change and the reality that we are
shifting and have been shifting over the

43
00:02:35,909 --> 00:02:38,909
course of the last decade from a world
that's dominated by linear change to

44
00:02:38,909 --> 00:02:40,769
one, dominated by exponential change.

45
00:02:41,099 --> 00:02:45,549
When exponential change hits your company
or your markets things get weirded really

46
00:02:45,549 --> 00:02:49,454
quickly and it makes it and it's easy
to feel as though you're off track.

47
00:02:49,514 --> 00:02:52,094
And so the number one
exponential out there right

48
00:02:52,094 --> 00:02:53,774
now, not hard to see it, is ai.

49
00:02:53,929 --> 00:02:57,019
It is everywhere right now, and it's
impacting every facet of business.

50
00:02:57,529 --> 00:03:01,559
When weird things happen and it, and
you're given cause to believe that

51
00:03:01,559 --> 00:03:04,709
you're off track, that's when the brain
immediately says, well, we need to

52
00:03:04,709 --> 00:03:06,659
go through a massive wholesale shift.

53
00:03:06,659 --> 00:03:07,859
We need to transform.

54
00:03:07,859 --> 00:03:11,099
We need to either get back on track
or track, or we need to fundamentally

55
00:03:11,099 --> 00:03:12,509
change the way we're doing things.

56
00:03:12,989 --> 00:03:15,899
That is an interesting way of
thinking about it, but the reality is

57
00:03:15,899 --> 00:03:18,149
transformations fail almost all the time.

58
00:03:18,569 --> 00:03:22,529
Deloitte has some data that shows the
transformations fail 70% of the time.

59
00:03:22,529 --> 00:03:24,359
Anecdotally, I'd say it's
more often than that.

60
00:03:24,419 --> 00:03:25,319
They're costly.

61
00:03:25,349 --> 00:03:28,589
People lose their jobs over them because
they, they don't really end up working.

62
00:03:29,069 --> 00:03:31,919
And Steve and I set out to write
something and introduce a body of

63
00:03:31,919 --> 00:03:34,619
research to the world that said, you
know, there is actually an alternative.

64
00:03:34,889 --> 00:03:38,489
You don't always have to
wait until things are.

65
00:03:38,789 --> 00:03:41,069
Too far off track to move
you can hone instead.

66
00:03:41,069 --> 00:03:42,269
And that's really what the book is about.

67
00:03:42,269 --> 00:03:46,349
And I'd say increasingly as we're impacted
by exponential change, which we will

68
00:03:46,349 --> 00:03:48,449
be hone will become even more relevant.

69
00:03:49,174 --> 00:03:51,694
Daniel Rowles: To that point, I watched
another interview you did with Brain Barn.

70
00:03:51,694 --> 00:03:56,344
It was talking about innovation and you'd
kind of made the point that innovation was

71
00:03:56,344 --> 00:03:57,934
always seen as important but not urgent.

72
00:03:57,934 --> 00:04:00,364
And you gave this example of, you know,
someone's going through some quarterly

73
00:04:00,364 --> 00:04:03,094
targets and they said, well, it's really
interesting what you said, but can

74
00:04:03,094 --> 00:04:04,654
we kind of come back to that as well?

75
00:04:04,954 --> 00:04:07,444
And I kind of connected those
two things massively because that

76
00:04:07,444 --> 00:04:10,964
idea of kind of baking innovation
in is kind of part of this.

77
00:04:10,964 --> 00:04:12,164
So could you speak to that a little bit?

78
00:04:13,274 --> 00:04:16,294
Geoff Tuff: That comment from brain Bar,
I think was born of the same realization

79
00:04:16,294 --> 00:04:18,064
of the world that we're living in today.

80
00:04:18,484 --> 00:04:22,984
You know, one of the things that we like
to talk about is that we have undergone

81
00:04:22,984 --> 00:04:26,674
a shift where we all have grown up.

82
00:04:26,674 --> 00:04:30,364
And when I say we all I'm saying, those
of us that are reasonably senior in

83
00:04:30,364 --> 00:04:33,634
our organizations who have been around
the business world for 20, 30 years,

84
00:04:34,024 --> 00:04:36,094
we grew up in organizations where.

85
00:04:37,264 --> 00:04:42,234
While it may not have been named out
loud, the general accepted way of

86
00:04:42,234 --> 00:04:47,964
thinking, the conventional wisdom was
that status quo is safe, change is risky.

87
00:04:48,114 --> 00:04:48,444
Okay.

88
00:04:48,444 --> 00:04:51,594
If we keep on doing what we're
doing and we don't rock the boat

89
00:04:51,594 --> 00:04:52,674
too much, we're gonna be okay.

90
00:04:52,674 --> 00:04:56,284
But if we really try to shake things
up and do things do things differently

91
00:04:56,314 --> 00:05:00,304
that, that may actually expose us to
risk and that makes us feel uncomfortable

92
00:05:00,304 --> 00:05:02,374
and that ultimately is, I think why.

93
00:05:03,409 --> 00:05:05,269
Innovation often does feel important.

94
00:05:05,269 --> 00:05:08,599
It's interesting, but not urgent
because it's actually, it's innovation

95
00:05:08,599 --> 00:05:09,919
does threaten the status quo.

96
00:05:09,919 --> 00:05:13,099
And we as human beings
have a status quo bias.

97
00:05:13,099 --> 00:05:14,179
We are loss averse.

98
00:05:14,389 --> 00:05:15,769
There's nothing we can
do to counteract it.

99
00:05:15,769 --> 00:05:16,909
It's just a reality.

100
00:05:16,909 --> 00:05:19,399
And, you know, if we innovate,
we're changing something

101
00:05:19,399 --> 00:05:20,359
and that feels threatening.

102
00:05:20,809 --> 00:05:23,239
But we have shifted to a
different type of world.

103
00:05:23,359 --> 00:05:27,889
And interestingly in, in the work that
Steve and I do with our clients, it's

104
00:05:27,889 --> 00:05:30,199
now way more frequently the case that.

105
00:05:30,419 --> 00:05:35,369
Status quo and accepting the status
quo is actually pretty risky and change

106
00:05:35,369 --> 00:05:36,629
is actually the safe thing to do.

107
00:05:36,659 --> 00:05:41,379
But you know, the key is to change
in the right ways and in, in hone and

108
00:05:41,379 --> 00:05:44,609
actually a lot of the writing that
we've done over time, we talk about

109
00:05:44,639 --> 00:05:47,339
the right way of approaching change
versus the wrong way, which actually

110
00:05:47,339 --> 00:05:49,344
does sometimes expose you to risk.

111
00:05:50,584 --> 00:05:53,429
Daniel Rowles: So, so talk to us about
this idea of Drift then, because why?

112
00:05:53,494 --> 00:05:55,114
Why is Drift such a big risk?

113
00:05:55,385 --> 00:05:57,675
riverside_geoff_tuff_raw-audio_digital_marketing p_0201-1:
Drift as you I'm sure recognize as part

114
00:05:57,675 --> 00:06:02,715
of the subtitle to the book, I will blame
myself for hauling, boating metaphors

115
00:06:02,715 --> 00:06:04,665
into just about everything we write.

116
00:06:04,725 --> 00:06:08,595
And again, as we were tossing around
ideas for the book, I explained to

117
00:06:08,595 --> 00:06:11,525
Steve who has been kind enough to
come out sailing with me on occasion,

118
00:06:11,525 --> 00:06:14,285
what it's like to go through.

119
00:06:14,650 --> 00:06:16,670
A planning a sale and executing a sale.

120
00:06:16,670 --> 00:06:20,090
And obviously this is a bit a
bit artificial in, its in its

121
00:06:20,210 --> 00:06:24,030
exactness, but one version of what
it looks like to go for sale is you.

122
00:06:24,875 --> 00:06:27,935
Hop on the boat, or before you hop on
the boat, you have a destination in mind

123
00:06:28,145 --> 00:06:32,765
and you can either see a point on land
or out on the horizon that you're aiming

124
00:06:32,765 --> 00:06:35,885
towards, or you have a set of coordinates
that you're sailing towards and you have

125
00:06:35,885 --> 00:06:40,965
a plan in mind and you set off on the sail
and inevitably as you are on that course.

126
00:06:41,875 --> 00:06:45,505
Wind impacts your course
of travel waves impact it.

127
00:06:45,535 --> 00:06:49,765
Current does, tides do, and
you're incrementally knocked

128
00:06:49,765 --> 00:06:50,875
off track here and there.

129
00:06:50,875 --> 00:06:55,075
But you actually have the ability to
recognize when you're drifting, when

130
00:06:55,075 --> 00:06:58,195
you're off track, either you can see
yourself drift away from the point on land

131
00:06:58,195 --> 00:07:01,015
you're aiming towards, or you have the
machine machinery to tell you that you're

132
00:07:01,475 --> 00:07:02,795
no longer on track to the coordinates.

133
00:07:02,795 --> 00:07:05,515
And so you adjust course
incrementally, you.

134
00:07:05,915 --> 00:07:07,055
Move the rudder a little bit.

135
00:07:07,085 --> 00:07:11,025
You trim the sails a little bit and
you're generally able to to stay on the

136
00:07:11,025 --> 00:07:12,345
course that you set off for yourself.

137
00:07:12,465 --> 00:07:14,355
And obviously that this
is very simplistic.

138
00:07:14,355 --> 00:07:17,235
There's times when you're going directly
into the wind where you need to tack

139
00:07:17,235 --> 00:07:20,625
back and forth, but that, anyway
it's a controllable path of travel.

140
00:07:21,540 --> 00:07:25,230
In business, unfortunately, there
is no point on the horizon that you

141
00:07:25,230 --> 00:07:29,580
can keep in your gaze and there are
no core coordinates that you can use

142
00:07:29,910 --> 00:07:31,740
to measure your course of travel.

143
00:07:31,800 --> 00:07:36,540
And so what ends up happening is even the
best leaders often will declare a desired

144
00:07:36,540 --> 00:07:39,920
outcome or to declare a goal they have
or a vision they have for the company.

145
00:07:39,920 --> 00:07:40,250
But.

146
00:07:40,550 --> 00:07:44,370
The reality of the day to day and
handling what comes at them every

147
00:07:44,370 --> 00:07:47,490
single day, akin to the waves and the
winds and the current and the tide.

148
00:07:47,850 --> 00:07:52,530
Things like new competitive entries or
new technologies on the scene, or shifting

149
00:07:52,530 --> 00:07:55,560
regulations or some sort of talent crisis.

150
00:07:55,900 --> 00:07:59,020
What they need to do is react to that
and solve those problems in the moment,

151
00:07:59,080 --> 00:08:03,290
and they probably do all the right things
to, to, or most of them do all the right

152
00:08:03,290 --> 00:08:05,660
things to tackle those day-to-day issues.

153
00:08:06,095 --> 00:08:09,425
What ends up happening is the management
systems that they use to address those

154
00:08:09,425 --> 00:08:14,285
issues over time pile up on one another
and they create this great encumbered.

155
00:08:14,285 --> 00:08:17,045
I'm now gonna extend the metaphor,
probably unnecessarily this great

156
00:08:17,255 --> 00:08:19,865
encumbered ship moving through the water.

157
00:08:19,865 --> 00:08:23,315
There's nowhere, anywhere close
to being on track to the desired,

158
00:08:23,345 --> 00:08:24,815
the original desired outcome.

159
00:08:25,175 --> 00:08:28,865
And it's when there is actually a
E, either for a report to the board

160
00:08:28,865 --> 00:08:31,295
or some reason to actually pick
up their heads and pay attention

161
00:08:31,295 --> 00:08:32,645
to where they are and realize it.

162
00:08:32,960 --> 00:08:35,810
Wow, we're really no longer
headed the direction we headed to.

163
00:08:35,840 --> 00:08:39,770
That's where the necessity to
transform or the desire to transform

164
00:08:39,770 --> 00:08:42,920
comes from because there's a
recognition that something massive

165
00:08:42,920 --> 00:08:44,600
has to happen to get back on track.

166
00:08:44,780 --> 00:08:50,480
And so that's the drift is what happens
when organizations are no longer aligned

167
00:08:50,480 --> 00:08:53,600
and headed towards their, what we call
in the book, their elemental purpose, the

168
00:08:53,600 --> 00:08:57,710
reason that they exist as an organization
to their stakeholders here on earth.

169
00:08:58,420 --> 00:09:00,520
Daniel Rowles: So, so that's where
the honing comes in, I'm assuming.

170
00:09:00,520 --> 00:09:03,220
And then so what does it that
kind of look like in context?

171
00:09:04,075 --> 00:09:06,455
Geoff Tuff: Yeah I've now plowed
through so many metaphors.

172
00:09:06,455 --> 00:09:09,205
I feel like we're gonna be
accused of using too of them

173
00:09:09,255 --> 00:09:09,765
Daniel Rowles: this is great.

174
00:09:09,765 --> 00:09:12,415
I mean, if you knew Kean, our
co-host, he's obsessed with analogies

175
00:09:12,415 --> 00:09:14,785
and particularly sailing analogies
'cause he spent a lot of time at the

176
00:09:14,785 --> 00:09:16,200
UK Sailing this fits in

177
00:09:16,200 --> 00:09:16,620
perfectly.

178
00:09:16,620 --> 00:09:17,130
Don't worry.

179
00:09:17,340 --> 00:09:18,480
riverside_geoff_tuff_raw-audio_digital_marketing p_0201-1:
We should spend more time together.

180
00:09:19,020 --> 00:09:21,960
So, honing came from an interaction
that Steve actually had.

181
00:09:22,530 --> 00:09:24,320
With a chef named Flannery.

182
00:09:24,320 --> 00:09:26,510
One of the things we did in this
book, because we always like to

183
00:09:26,510 --> 00:09:30,440
try to bring the business ideas we
have to life in accessible ways.

184
00:09:30,440 --> 00:09:32,900
We profiled four different artisans.

185
00:09:32,900 --> 00:09:35,420
So Flannery was, is a
chef that we spoke to.

186
00:09:35,420 --> 00:09:37,790
We spoke to Sam Pollard,
who's a documentary filmmaker.

187
00:09:37,790 --> 00:09:40,780
We spoke to Anna Vanderwal,
who's a very well known.

188
00:09:41,525 --> 00:09:43,925
Boating photographer, actually
yachting photographer.

189
00:09:43,925 --> 00:09:46,225
And then we spoke to a good
old fashioned rock band from

190
00:09:46,225 --> 00:09:47,545
Canada called Our Lady Peace.

191
00:09:47,545 --> 00:09:51,115
We spoke to the lead singer in the
bass, and Flannery was the, was one

192
00:09:51,115 --> 00:09:52,315
of the artisans that we spoke to.

193
00:09:53,310 --> 00:09:55,080
Steve, this was actually
nothing to do with the book.

194
00:09:55,080 --> 00:09:58,980
Steve was just with her when she was
preparing to cook a meal at some point,

195
00:09:58,980 --> 00:10:02,310
and she pulled out her, well, we never
really knew the technical term for

196
00:10:02,310 --> 00:10:03,540
all these things, but the honing rod.

197
00:10:03,540 --> 00:10:06,480
And she started, you know,
going away at it with her knife.

198
00:10:06,480 --> 00:10:10,080
And Steve said to Flannery, you
know, Flannery I see you do this

199
00:10:10,080 --> 00:10:11,160
almost every single time you cook.

200
00:10:11,190 --> 00:10:14,160
Why do you have to sharpen your
knives every single time you cook?

201
00:10:14,160 --> 00:10:16,020
And she said, actually,
Steve, you've got it wrong.

202
00:10:16,455 --> 00:10:19,305
I'm not sharpening the
knife, I'm honing the knife.

203
00:10:19,725 --> 00:10:23,235
And there is a fundamental difference
because when you sharpen a knife, you are

204
00:10:23,235 --> 00:10:25,635
actually removing steel from the blade.

205
00:10:25,695 --> 00:10:30,105
It's an act of destruction and you are
revealing a sharp edge underneath it.

206
00:10:30,105 --> 00:10:30,195
But.

207
00:10:31,145 --> 00:10:35,465
Ultimately what you're doing is removing
steel from the blade and that over time

208
00:10:35,495 --> 00:10:37,025
it, you can't do that indefinitely.

209
00:10:37,025 --> 00:10:40,985
The knife becomes brittle, it gets
worn down it breaks, and too much

210
00:10:40,985 --> 00:10:42,665
sharpening is bad for the knife.

211
00:10:43,055 --> 00:10:45,755
So instead, what we do as chefs
most of the time is we hone our

212
00:10:45,755 --> 00:10:48,455
knives before we cook and hone is
different because we're not actually

213
00:10:48,455 --> 00:10:50,495
removing steel from the blade.

214
00:10:50,495 --> 00:10:52,505
What we're doing is we're
realigning all those.

215
00:10:53,285 --> 00:10:55,235
I think she called them snaggy teeth.

216
00:10:55,265 --> 00:10:58,805
Things that the bit, the bits of metal
that microscopically have kind of come

217
00:10:58,805 --> 00:11:03,875
outta line and we're bringing them back
together into an edge that will perform

218
00:11:03,875 --> 00:11:07,725
as we need the knife to perform, to
be safe and to, you know, to do all

219
00:11:07,725 --> 00:11:09,165
the things we need to do as chefs.

220
00:11:09,195 --> 00:11:12,825
And it was an interesting moment
when Steve and I then talked about

221
00:11:12,825 --> 00:11:16,155
that experience he had because
it's, to us, it's a very similar.

222
00:11:16,735 --> 00:11:21,590
Temptation that companies have or if
you equate sharpening to transforming,

223
00:11:22,070 --> 00:11:25,190
and yes, you may transform a company and
if you're lucky enough to be one of the

224
00:11:25,190 --> 00:11:30,690
few ones that are successful to actually
to get it done right you may end up.

225
00:11:30,780 --> 00:11:34,140
In a good place with a sharp edge
for some period of time, but there's

226
00:11:34,140 --> 00:11:35,760
only so often you can do that.

227
00:11:35,760 --> 00:11:40,350
And instead, it's much better to pay
attention day in, day out to honing

228
00:11:40,380 --> 00:11:42,930
your management systems, which is
what, which are the tools of the

229
00:11:42,930 --> 00:11:46,895
trade of most senior executives
in organizations to stay on track.

230
00:11:48,195 --> 00:11:48,675
Daniel Rowles: I love that.

231
00:11:48,675 --> 00:11:51,945
And so how do leaders think about
honing their organizations then,

232
00:11:51,945 --> 00:11:53,295
and how does that look in context?

233
00:11:54,180 --> 00:11:55,980
riverside_geoff_tuff_raw-audio_digital_marketing p_0201-1:
There is a theme through all of the

234
00:11:56,040 --> 00:11:58,890
writing that Steve and I do that actually
is kind of fundamental to how we think

235
00:11:58,890 --> 00:12:00,015
about business, and that is that.

236
00:12:01,140 --> 00:12:06,090
Change of whatever scale
doesn't happen unless someone

237
00:12:06,090 --> 00:12:08,190
somewhere changes their behavior.

238
00:12:08,340 --> 00:12:13,540
So I don't care how dominated we are for
by AI or technology, it is a fundamental

239
00:12:13,540 --> 00:12:17,260
reality that change doesn't happen unless
there's a behavioral change somewhere

240
00:12:17,260 --> 00:12:19,090
in the value system of an organization.

241
00:12:19,090 --> 00:12:24,100
So we think about that as the kind of
subatomic element of how businesses run.

242
00:12:24,755 --> 00:12:27,275
And so the purpose of management.

243
00:12:27,275 --> 00:12:29,825
The purpose of leadership
ultimately, is to make sure.

244
00:12:30,580 --> 00:12:36,370
That one, especially at senior levels of
the organization, is exerting the right

245
00:12:36,370 --> 00:12:40,450
type of control to drive the right types
of behaviors to achieve the outcomes

246
00:12:40,450 --> 00:12:44,360
that organization needs to achieve, to
stay profitable or for the mission of the

247
00:12:44,360 --> 00:12:46,440
moment whatever the desired outcome is.

248
00:12:46,840 --> 00:12:50,270
And the issue we've got, I think and
one of the orthodoxies that Steve and I

249
00:12:50,270 --> 00:12:52,590
wanted to challenge in this book is that.

250
00:12:53,505 --> 00:12:57,960
Many senior leaders, and I'll just say
for ease of reference now, CEOs, when

251
00:12:58,020 --> 00:13:03,150
many CEOs think it's their job to be the
inspirational leader of an organization.

252
00:13:03,150 --> 00:13:06,430
So they're the ones who chart
the course for the company.

253
00:13:06,430 --> 00:13:09,130
They're the ones who make the
promises to the capital markets.

254
00:13:09,130 --> 00:13:12,740
They're the ones who declare the vision
and set the mission statement and

255
00:13:12,740 --> 00:13:14,510
often they are the ones who approve.

256
00:13:15,005 --> 00:13:18,335
The markets that they play in and the
products that they prioritize and the

257
00:13:18,335 --> 00:13:19,745
business models that they're going to use.

258
00:13:19,745 --> 00:13:23,165
All the things that kind of,
that set the conditions for

259
00:13:23,165 --> 00:13:24,995
actually getting a strategy done.

260
00:13:25,505 --> 00:13:28,805
But then when it comes time to actually
go and execute that strategy, they hand

261
00:13:28,805 --> 00:13:32,705
that off to someone else, usually lower
down in the organization, and they ask

262
00:13:32,705 --> 00:13:37,055
for reports quarterly or semi-annually
or what have you on how it's going.

263
00:13:37,485 --> 00:13:40,230
That unfortunately is
the wrong use of power.

264
00:13:40,755 --> 00:13:44,615
And that's our core contention in
in home because the things that

265
00:13:44,615 --> 00:13:46,505
a company has at its disposal.

266
00:13:46,875 --> 00:13:52,075
To hone, to drive the behaviors
that ultimately are the things

267
00:13:52,075 --> 00:13:55,825
that affect change or that affect
outcomes are management systems.

268
00:13:55,975 --> 00:13:59,245
So think and I'll now just turn
that around and say by definition, a

269
00:13:59,245 --> 00:14:04,325
management system is anything within an
organization, either formal or informal,

270
00:14:04,385 --> 00:14:06,065
that drives behavioral outcomes.

271
00:14:06,265 --> 00:14:09,475
So think of performance metrics.

272
00:14:09,865 --> 00:14:14,065
Think of budget allocation processes,
think of declared decision rights.

273
00:14:14,335 --> 00:14:17,005
These were all things that
ultimately guide behavior.

274
00:14:17,005 --> 00:14:20,285
But, and those are all those things I
just named are formal management systems.

275
00:14:20,285 --> 00:14:24,925
They're informal ones as well, such as the
types of questions that senior executives

276
00:14:24,925 --> 00:14:28,885
ask in meetings or the way you kind of
interact with others in the hallway.

277
00:14:29,125 --> 00:14:31,015
Ultimately, there's a lot of things that.

278
00:14:31,745 --> 00:14:34,475
Our management systems that drive
behavior that if you sum them all

279
00:14:34,475 --> 00:14:35,945
up, they're the company's culture.

280
00:14:35,945 --> 00:14:37,745
But that's a conversation
for a different time.

281
00:14:38,225 --> 00:14:42,245
And what we believe should be
happening to hone is that yes,

282
00:14:42,305 --> 00:14:44,465
senior executive CEOs should be.

283
00:14:45,155 --> 00:14:49,205
Setting the course and setting the vision
for a company, but then they really need

284
00:14:49,205 --> 00:14:52,835
to get their hands dirty in executing
through those management systems.

285
00:14:52,835 --> 00:14:56,855
So we, we spend a lot of time at home
talking about the importance of CEOs,

286
00:14:56,855 --> 00:15:00,965
thinking of themselves as being chief
system designers, so really understanding

287
00:15:01,575 --> 00:15:04,610
what behaviors they're trying to drive
and designing the management systems

288
00:15:04,610 --> 00:15:06,050
that will create those outcomes.

289
00:15:06,230 --> 00:15:07,340
Not always on their own.

290
00:15:07,340 --> 00:15:08,630
Obviously they need to work with others.

291
00:15:08,630 --> 00:15:12,140
They can't do everything, but they
need to have their fingers in.

292
00:15:12,545 --> 00:15:16,715
The details of how that work is being
done, if ultimately they're gonna prevent

293
00:15:16,715 --> 00:15:18,125
the drift that we talked about before.

294
00:15:19,190 --> 00:15:19,910
Daniel Rowles: I love that idea.

295
00:15:19,910 --> 00:15:22,610
'cause I've spoken previous about
the idea of digital transformation

296
00:15:22,610 --> 00:15:24,050
being about purposeful culture.

297
00:15:24,110 --> 00:15:27,560
IE not just the way we think do things
around here, but like actually what can

298
00:15:27,560 --> 00:15:29,210
we put in place to create that culture?

299
00:15:29,210 --> 00:15:31,220
And it relates back to those
kind of management systems.

300
00:15:31,220 --> 00:15:34,580
So, I was just gonna add, there
are some examples of leaders that

301
00:15:34,580 --> 00:15:35,900
are, have been good at doing this.

302
00:15:37,355 --> 00:15:40,730
riverside_geoff_tuff_raw-audio_digital_marketing p_0201-1:
There are and I it feels a bit like

303
00:15:40,730 --> 00:15:44,410
an easy out for me to name the one I'm
gonna name, but I'm gonna do it because

304
00:15:44,410 --> 00:15:47,470
I actually do genuinely believe in
this and we write about it in the book.

305
00:15:47,470 --> 00:15:50,470
But Jeff Bezos and what he's
been able to accomplish over the

306
00:15:50,470 --> 00:15:52,810
course of his time at Amazon.

307
00:15:52,810 --> 00:15:55,810
I mean, if you, if, and I don't
happen to know the man and I

308
00:15:55,870 --> 00:15:56,920
read the same business press.

309
00:15:56,920 --> 00:15:58,930
Everyone else does, but
everything you read about.

310
00:15:59,455 --> 00:16:03,985
The processes that they use within Amazon
to drive the types of outcomes that

311
00:16:03,985 --> 00:16:08,470
they want to suggest that he innately
or maybe he thinks very similarly.

312
00:16:08,520 --> 00:16:12,180
He innately knows that he needs to be in
on the details of how the company runs.

313
00:16:12,180 --> 00:16:15,530
So, you know, the famous
five page memo before.

314
00:16:15,875 --> 00:16:19,505
A meeting instead of having a lot of
presentation slides, he set the tone.

315
00:16:19,505 --> 00:16:22,895
He didn't just set the tone, he made
it a requirement that people write the

316
00:16:22,895 --> 00:16:26,675
summary memo of the purpose of the meeting
and distribute it ahead of time so that

317
00:16:27,215 --> 00:16:30,275
when they come into the meeting and
not everyone is faffing about listening

318
00:16:30,275 --> 00:16:33,185
to presentations and being bored and
being on their phones, they're actually

319
00:16:33,185 --> 00:16:34,505
digging into the details immediately.

320
00:16:34,505 --> 00:16:36,865
And I'm sure I'm butchering
that the purpose behind that.

321
00:16:36,865 --> 00:16:41,185
But that did a bunch of different things,
both for the culture of the organization

322
00:16:41,185 --> 00:16:43,645
and for the way people behaved that.

323
00:16:43,925 --> 00:16:47,695
Led to, I think one of the
reasons for success behind Amazon.

324
00:16:47,695 --> 00:16:51,475
It trained people to think ahead of
meetings about what they wanted to convey.

325
00:16:51,775 --> 00:16:55,735
It forced people to put ideas down on
paper in a way that were succinct and

326
00:16:56,095 --> 00:16:58,660
therefore processed multiple different
times before they actually got.

327
00:16:59,220 --> 00:17:02,520
Passed around in the memo, it
forced people to, to read the memos

328
00:17:02,520 --> 00:17:04,590
ahead of the meeting unless they
wanted to be caught out in it.

329
00:17:04,590 --> 00:17:06,990
And it led to a culture of
being just much more efficient.

330
00:17:06,990 --> 00:17:10,110
And you think about all of those
things from that simple act

331
00:17:10,110 --> 00:17:11,430
with that one management system.

332
00:17:11,430 --> 00:17:15,210
And that's one of only dozens and dozens
that I've read about at Amazon over time.

333
00:17:15,480 --> 00:17:17,900
Think about the impact
that, that one thing.

334
00:17:18,350 --> 00:17:20,300
Did, and it came from Jeff himself.

335
00:17:20,300 --> 00:17:22,220
He's the one that declared
that was gonna be the case.

336
00:17:22,220 --> 00:17:25,640
And so, you know, you could
pick example after example.

337
00:17:25,880 --> 00:17:29,660
Early on declaring that everything
had to have an API, so that there

338
00:17:29,660 --> 00:17:32,180
was intercommunication between
different parts of the company that

339
00:17:32,180 --> 00:17:36,430
led to a completely different type
of company structure and culture

340
00:17:36,430 --> 00:17:38,410
than we see in most companies today.

341
00:17:38,660 --> 00:17:39,260
All of the.

342
00:17:40,175 --> 00:17:43,925
Investments that they made early on
in trying out new business models

343
00:17:43,925 --> 00:17:48,335
in small ways and being willing to
explore whether it made sense to

344
00:17:48,755 --> 00:17:52,465
get into AWS for example, which of
course is now a behemoth in the world.

345
00:17:52,515 --> 00:17:55,575
The reason I fall back on what,
what could feel like an easy

346
00:17:55,605 --> 00:17:57,405
kind of trite business story.

347
00:17:57,585 --> 00:17:59,805
And it's not trite, it's
actually really interesting.

348
00:17:59,805 --> 00:18:03,805
But it's because you can
actually attach the actions.

349
00:18:04,255 --> 00:18:08,610
That led to the powerful outcomes in
Amazon to the individual himself, the

350
00:18:08,610 --> 00:18:10,620
CEO, who in this case was Jeff Bezos.

351
00:18:11,535 --> 00:18:14,055
Daniel Rowles: Well, that, that leads me
on nicely into something that's come up

352
00:18:14,055 --> 00:18:17,475
in a previous book, which is this idea
of, you know, minimally viable move and

353
00:18:17,485 --> 00:18:21,025
we've all heard minimal viable products,
but how does that relate to this?

354
00:18:21,625 --> 00:18:24,520
Geoff Tuff: Well, you got the you
got the etymology right of the

355
00:18:24,520 --> 00:18:26,140
term, so a minimally viable product.

356
00:18:26,140 --> 00:18:27,100
I'm sure everyone.

357
00:18:27,570 --> 00:18:31,470
Knows, or at least all your listeners
know, is a is an approach to doing

358
00:18:31,470 --> 00:18:34,170
product development where you do a little
bit of development work, you put it out

359
00:18:34,170 --> 00:18:37,890
into the world, you see a reaction, and
depending on the reaction, you pull it

360
00:18:37,890 --> 00:18:40,830
back into the lab and you either continue
on down that development path or you do

361
00:18:40,830 --> 00:18:42,330
something different based on the feedback.

362
00:18:42,960 --> 00:18:46,890
The exact same approach can be applied
to any sort of management decision.

363
00:18:47,205 --> 00:18:51,345
Square, if you can boil what you're
trying to do down to the smallest,

364
00:18:51,345 --> 00:18:55,035
testable hypothesis, and just
go do it and get some feedback.

365
00:18:55,095 --> 00:18:57,745
And you know, if it sounds like.

366
00:18:58,600 --> 00:19:00,400
Whether you're trying to make a
talent decision, you're trying to

367
00:19:00,400 --> 00:19:03,230
make a partnership decision with
another company or if you could

368
00:19:03,230 --> 00:19:04,580
be in product development as well.

369
00:19:05,060 --> 00:19:07,760
If the feedback from your target
audience is positive, then yes,

370
00:19:07,760 --> 00:19:10,640
take the next step and then the next
step and continue on down that path.

371
00:19:10,640 --> 00:19:14,870
If it's not, if it's not good, then
don't go wildly in a different direction.

372
00:19:14,870 --> 00:19:18,890
But because you're working in these
smallest kind of viable moves, you

373
00:19:18,890 --> 00:19:21,950
can take a small step sideways and try
something a little bit different and

374
00:19:22,000 --> 00:19:27,520
the connection between using minimally
viable moves and honing is that if you

375
00:19:27,520 --> 00:19:32,560
do that with everything that, that you
use to run a company, then you're never

376
00:19:32,560 --> 00:19:35,770
gonna get that far off track because
you're constantly making those small

377
00:19:35,770 --> 00:19:39,670
adjustments, just like the small moves in
the rudder or the small trimming of the

378
00:19:39,670 --> 00:19:42,160
sales to stay on track the entire time.

379
00:19:42,480 --> 00:19:45,660
I would imagine that many
of your listeners would.

380
00:19:46,070 --> 00:19:48,890
Hear that and say, yeah, that,
that seems like good common sense.

381
00:19:48,890 --> 00:19:52,160
But the reality is most companies
do not operate that way.

382
00:19:52,220 --> 00:19:56,480
They, and they analyze a decision
for months and months, or they let

383
00:19:57,040 --> 00:20:01,750
new products get stale and stagegate
systems for literally 18 months to two

384
00:20:01,750 --> 00:20:03,820
years to try to get the answer right.

385
00:20:04,315 --> 00:20:08,545
Not recognizing that actually past
data and all the analysis that

386
00:20:08,545 --> 00:20:11,935
they're doing is absolutely useless
in the face of the change that we're

387
00:20:11,935 --> 00:20:13,045
facing out in the outside world.

388
00:20:13,045 --> 00:20:17,395
And the only way to go and explore
potential outcomes in the face of

389
00:20:17,395 --> 00:20:18,715
uncertainty is go try something.

390
00:20:18,715 --> 00:20:20,695
You're never gonna analyze
yourself to the right answer.

391
00:20:21,640 --> 00:20:22,570
Daniel Rowles: Right on that point.

392
00:20:22,570 --> 00:20:25,440
Now, I'd like to come point to
you, raised a moment ago was this

393
00:20:25,440 --> 00:20:27,810
talk about management systems
as being, you know, the nervous

394
00:20:27,810 --> 00:20:30,090
system of the organization and I'm.

395
00:20:30,720 --> 00:20:33,630
You talked about the purposeful ones,
but also maybe some of the underlying

396
00:20:33,630 --> 00:20:35,760
stuff that happens organically.

397
00:20:36,960 --> 00:20:39,780
To me, this is really at the heart
of how you kind of make this work and

398
00:20:39,780 --> 00:20:41,550
how most digital transformations fail.

399
00:20:42,060 --> 00:20:44,280
So do you mind just talking about
that a little bit more again as well,

400
00:20:44,280 --> 00:20:47,310
Geoff Tuff: I think the informal ones
in some ways are, the word that comes

401
00:20:47,310 --> 00:20:50,460
to mind are the more insidious ones,
they're the ones that people sometimes

402
00:20:50,460 --> 00:20:52,200
don't challenge and don't even recognize.

403
00:20:52,200 --> 00:20:55,880
But you know, all the you know,
performance management and I talked

404
00:20:55,880 --> 00:21:00,320
before about budgeting and the more
formal ones I think are reasonably

405
00:21:00,860 --> 00:21:02,300
obvious how, what you need to do.

406
00:21:02,300 --> 00:21:03,920
It's actually incredibly hard though.

407
00:21:03,920 --> 00:21:05,960
I, and we had an experience
with this yesterday, trying

408
00:21:05,960 --> 00:21:07,580
to lead a group through this.

409
00:21:07,580 --> 00:21:10,250
Even when, you know the impact
of the formal management systems,

410
00:21:10,250 --> 00:21:12,920
you know which ones matter and
you know what the problem is.

411
00:21:13,475 --> 00:21:18,275
Nailing down a behavioral change that
needs to occur and finding an individual

412
00:21:18,275 --> 00:21:22,055
who is going to change a management
system to drive that behavior that

413
00:21:22,055 --> 00:21:25,485
gets really difficult no matter how
obvious on the surface the solution is.

414
00:21:25,975 --> 00:21:26,755
But it's doable.

415
00:21:26,755 --> 00:21:28,840
It just, you need to constantly
come back to the question of.

416
00:21:29,620 --> 00:21:32,890
What is the behavior we're trying to
drive and who has the control over the

417
00:21:32,890 --> 00:21:34,300
management system to go and drive it?

418
00:21:34,330 --> 00:21:35,830
That in itself is an act of honing.

419
00:21:35,830 --> 00:21:36,940
Getting closer to the answer.

420
00:21:37,400 --> 00:21:41,960
The informal ones though are a lot
harder to see and actually this in

421
00:21:41,960 --> 00:21:45,080
some ways goes back to the first
book that Steve and I wrote together.

422
00:21:45,130 --> 00:21:48,760
Detonate, we talked a lot about orthodoxy
and the power of orthodoxies, just the.

423
00:21:49,490 --> 00:21:53,240
Unspoken conventional wisdom around
the hallways of an organization.

424
00:21:53,640 --> 00:21:57,060
In order to have a complete look at
the management systems, we need to

425
00:21:57,060 --> 00:22:00,780
understand how Orthodoxy is driving
behavior in our organizations.

426
00:22:00,960 --> 00:22:04,260
And there, there's it, there
are myriad ways that happens.

427
00:22:04,260 --> 00:22:05,340
But you know, the core.

428
00:22:06,200 --> 00:22:12,260
Trick to start to root out some of
those is just to ask literally, why

429
00:22:12,260 --> 00:22:13,970
are we doing things the way that we do?

430
00:22:14,060 --> 00:22:17,600
Whenever something seems like it's
taking too long or we're not getting

431
00:22:17,600 --> 00:22:19,730
the outcomes, what are the forces that.

432
00:22:20,405 --> 00:22:21,605
Are leading to that.

433
00:22:21,635 --> 00:22:24,425
What are some of the belief systems
that we're carrying around in our

434
00:22:24,425 --> 00:22:28,365
head that that we can address that
to get to a different outcome?

435
00:22:28,365 --> 00:22:32,785
And, you know, interestingly, or
perhaps obviously a lot of the time the

436
00:22:32,785 --> 00:22:35,695
things that are driving the behavior
are the way that senior leaders are

437
00:22:35,695 --> 00:22:39,445
acting so beyond what people get
paid for, just the way that they,

438
00:22:39,895 --> 00:22:41,935
what they ask about in the hallway.

439
00:22:41,935 --> 00:22:46,930
We had a great example of a very
senior executive at a CPG company that.

440
00:22:47,740 --> 00:22:50,975
Steve and I were working with, and he
was incredibly frustrated because and

441
00:22:50,975 --> 00:22:55,455
we were consulting with them on how to
get better innovation out of the system.

442
00:22:55,455 --> 00:22:58,905
And it was, we had a realization
collectively that actually the most

443
00:22:58,905 --> 00:23:02,235
important innovation they could, they
could earn more money from was to

444
00:23:02,235 --> 00:23:05,265
drive commercial innovation and to
think about business model innovation.

445
00:23:05,265 --> 00:23:07,395
And there was a, you know, that
was the mandate that we had.

446
00:23:07,965 --> 00:23:11,835
And the senior executive was
getting incredibly frustrated

447
00:23:11,835 --> 00:23:15,465
with this team that they weren't
hearing the message and coming up

448
00:23:15,465 --> 00:23:16,575
with more commercial innovations.

449
00:23:16,575 --> 00:23:19,065
'cause every single time they came
into a meeting, they started talking

450
00:23:19,065 --> 00:23:22,585
about the product innovations that they
had that the team had come up with.

451
00:23:22,645 --> 00:23:25,405
And Steve and I sat in a
couple of these meetings and.

452
00:23:25,975 --> 00:23:29,185
Over time, it became pretty obvious
what was happening because this senior

453
00:23:29,185 --> 00:23:32,455
executive and he was actually head of
the business group, every single time a

454
00:23:32,455 --> 00:23:35,635
meeting started, someone would come in
with a product innovation and he would ooh

455
00:23:35,635 --> 00:23:40,015
and awe over the product innovation for 10
minutes before the meeting even started.

456
00:23:40,795 --> 00:23:43,165
Then, you know, we'd get back down to
business and remind them that they were

457
00:23:43,165 --> 00:23:45,265
supposed to be working on commercial
innovation, but he had trained the

458
00:23:45,265 --> 00:23:49,135
team to, no matter what was said, no
matter what the strategy said, he had

459
00:23:49,135 --> 00:23:53,725
trained the team to, to recognize that
he rewarded product innovation, even

460
00:23:53,725 --> 00:23:55,015
though that wasn't what he was saying.

461
00:23:55,585 --> 00:23:59,855
That there's a, there's another
great story that, I don't know if

462
00:23:59,855 --> 00:24:02,895
it's a apocryphal or not, but we've
been telling it recently 'cause

463
00:24:03,065 --> 00:24:04,745
Steve heard about it somewhere.

464
00:24:04,745 --> 00:24:08,605
But apparently at some point in time, Jay
Edgar Hoover, who many of your listeners

465
00:24:08,605 --> 00:24:13,885
may know, ran the US FBI for a very long
time and had responsibility for our.

466
00:24:14,085 --> 00:24:16,045
Our FBI network.

467
00:24:16,075 --> 00:24:21,155
And the way he communicated with me, many
members of his team was through memos.

468
00:24:21,155 --> 00:24:25,005
They would write him a memo and he would
respond to them by jotting down notes

469
00:24:25,005 --> 00:24:26,505
on the memo and send it back to them.

470
00:24:27,135 --> 00:24:29,175
And obviously he's
responsible for intelligence.

471
00:24:29,175 --> 00:24:31,635
And so that was the domain
that he was working in, and

472
00:24:31,635 --> 00:24:33,525
he got a memo at some point.

473
00:24:34,790 --> 00:24:38,640
He read through the memo and he,
you know, wrote on the in the margin

474
00:24:38,640 --> 00:24:40,050
of the memo, watch the borders.

475
00:24:42,555 --> 00:24:46,485
People who got the memo back, who've
been trained not to, you know, question

476
00:24:46,485 --> 00:24:50,285
J or Hoover, but to go and execute on
his commands, that's what they did.

477
00:24:50,375 --> 00:24:54,360
Immediately started deploying people
to the borders of Canada and Mexico

478
00:24:54,360 --> 00:24:56,670
because he had written Watch the Borders.

479
00:24:57,210 --> 00:25:00,930
And what he actually meant is your
margins are too big in this memo.

480
00:25:01,260 --> 00:25:06,185
Watch the borders of your memo, and it's
just, it's one of those stories that is I

481
00:25:06,185 --> 00:25:10,335
think it resonates so much, especially in
business community, if it's even true, by

482
00:25:10,335 --> 00:25:13,365
the way, I don't know if it's true, but it
resonates much in business communities to

483
00:25:13,365 --> 00:25:17,655
think about how often a senior executive
in a meeting will either say something

484
00:25:17,655 --> 00:25:21,195
or ask a question, and then immediately
after the meeting, everyone runs to go to

485
00:25:21,195 --> 00:25:23,985
try to get the answer because they believe
that's the most important thing they can

486
00:25:23,985 --> 00:25:25,545
go and do without actually effort just.

487
00:25:26,745 --> 00:25:28,875
Putting up their hand and saying,
is this just a point of curiosity

488
00:25:28,875 --> 00:25:31,095
or is it something you really
want us to go and run down,

489
00:25:32,335 --> 00:25:32,760
Daniel Rowles: I love it.

490
00:25:32,820 --> 00:25:36,750
And so, so I mean, if someone's read
the book and they're kind of thinking

491
00:25:36,750 --> 00:25:37,680
about these principles, would you.

492
00:25:37,680 --> 00:25:40,700
You think the first thing a leader should
go off and do after going through home?

493
00:25:41,465 --> 00:25:42,635
Geoff Tuff: engage.

494
00:25:43,200 --> 00:25:45,990
In whatever way they have to
engage down into the organization.

495
00:25:45,990 --> 00:25:49,410
So not just their senior executive
team, but down through the middle and

496
00:25:49,410 --> 00:25:53,090
lower management layers of the system
to understand and collectively decide

497
00:25:53,390 --> 00:25:54,680
what are the behaviors that matter.

498
00:25:55,070 --> 00:25:58,190
And sometimes it's obvious what
behaviors matter in, in an organization.

499
00:25:58,190 --> 00:25:59,600
And when I say behaviors here, by the way.

500
00:26:00,050 --> 00:26:03,500
I think about it expansively as being
the behaviors within the organization,

501
00:26:03,500 --> 00:26:05,360
but also outside the organization.

502
00:26:06,000 --> 00:26:08,190
But get the conversation going
about what behaviors matter.

503
00:26:08,240 --> 00:26:11,870
That in and of itself will change
the way that people look at

504
00:26:11,870 --> 00:26:13,370
and think about their business.

505
00:26:13,730 --> 00:26:16,940
But it will then start the dialogue
around, okay, let's, you know, we

506
00:26:16,940 --> 00:26:19,310
can't shift every single behavior
we would like to, but let's.

507
00:26:20,135 --> 00:26:21,275
Understand which ones matter.

508
00:26:21,275 --> 00:26:25,265
Let's do some sort of prioritization
and then let's start to realign our

509
00:26:25,265 --> 00:26:28,685
management systems to drive the things
that will be most in line with us,

510
00:26:28,685 --> 00:26:30,515
staying on track to what we set off to do.

511
00:26:31,025 --> 00:26:33,555
And if we can do nothing
other than simply.

512
00:26:34,155 --> 00:26:38,145
You know, reconfigure companies to go
drive the behaviors that matter to them.

513
00:26:38,145 --> 00:26:40,545
That in and of itself is
a massive source of value.

514
00:26:40,635 --> 00:26:45,145
But I bet just the very starting of
the conversation to to talk about

515
00:26:45,145 --> 00:26:47,665
behaviors, especially with all levels
of the organization, will lead to a

516
00:26:47,665 --> 00:26:51,505
different lead to a different cultural
approach to management as well.

517
00:26:52,500 --> 00:26:54,415
Daniel Rowles: Well, we will put the
link through to the book into the show

518
00:26:54,415 --> 00:26:56,905
notes, so target internet.com/podcast.

519
00:26:56,905 --> 00:26:59,755
Is there anywhere else, Jeff, that people
can kind of follow what you're doing

520
00:26:59,755 --> 00:27:00,780
and the other things you're working on?

521
00:27:01,615 --> 00:27:04,255
Geoff Tuff: So absolutely the best
place to find anything that Steve

522
00:27:04,255 --> 00:27:05,815
and I are doing is on LinkedIn.

523
00:27:05,865 --> 00:27:08,355
We would love for people to connect to us.

524
00:27:08,405 --> 00:27:13,245
We only get to write these books because
we learn from people like your listeners

525
00:27:13,245 --> 00:27:17,365
and anytime they would like to engage,
whether it's to just talk about some of

526
00:27:17,365 --> 00:27:20,725
the ideas or invite us out to discuss
some of the ideas with companies.

527
00:27:20,725 --> 00:27:22,075
We're always game to do that.

528
00:27:22,075 --> 00:27:23,235
That's that's what we like.

529
00:27:23,335 --> 00:27:25,915
Well, it's not the only thing we like
in our lives, but we really enjoy that.

530
00:27:26,244 --> 00:27:27,564
Daniel Rowles: We will put the
link through to those LinkedIn

531
00:27:27,564 --> 00:27:29,114
connections in the show notes as well.

532
00:27:29,114 --> 00:27:31,544
Jeff t thank you so much for
joining us and discussing home.

533
00:27:31,726 --> 00:27:31,936
Geoff Tuff: Yeah.

534
00:27:31,936 --> 00:27:32,716
Thank you for having me.

